United States · Law school admission
A full LSAT practice test in the current format: two Logical Reasoning sections, one Reading Comprehension section and two Argumentative Writing prompts, with an explanation for every option. Try five free questions first.
Included with tutoring
Book a block of 50 hours or more with New York Law Tutor and our practice assessments for this exam are included at no extra cost. Your tutor can set them for you, mark your written answers and practise questions with you live.
Buy on their own
Not taking tutoring? You can buy any practice set on its own.
£79.99
The exam
| Scored sections | Two Logical Reasoning sections and one Reading Comprehension section, 35 minutes each |
|---|---|
| Unscored section | One further multiple-choice section that does not count towards your score |
| Logic games | Analytical Reasoning was removed from the LSAT in August 2024 |
| Argumentative Writing | A separate 50-minute task: 15 minutes to plan, then 35 minutes to write |
| Score | 120 to 180 |
Sources: LSAC: about the LSAT. Check the official website for current rules and dates.
Try one
Sample question · Main conclusion
City planner: Many residents have argued that the proposed bike lanes on Elm Avenue will worsen traffic congestion because they will take away a lane now used by cars. But this concern is misplaced. Traffic counts show that during peak hours Elm Avenue's second lane is occupied mainly by double-parked delivery vehicles, so it does little to move cars now. Moreover, in three comparable cities, adding bike lanes to similar streets was followed by no measurable increase in commute times.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the overall conclusion drawn in the city planner's argument?
B is correct: the planner says the residents' concern 'is misplaced' and offers the traffic counts and the comparable-city evidence as reasons for that claim, so B restates the conclusion.
A: This is a supporting claim, drawn from the traffic counts and offered in support of the conclusion; it is not the conclusion itself.
C: The planner cites only three comparable cities; this sweeping generalization is neither stated nor concluded.
D: The planner says delivery vehicles occupy the second lane, not that they are the main cause of congestion.
E: The planner argues only that one objection fails; recommending immediate construction goes beyond the argument.
Questions
The LSAT has two scored Logical Reasoning sections and one scored Reading Comprehension section, each 35 minutes, plus an unscored section. Logic games (Analytical Reasoning) were removed in August 2024. LSAT Argumentative Writing is taken separately.
Each multiple-choice section lasts 35 minutes. Argumentative Writing gives you 15 minutes to plan and 35 minutes to write.
No. Our questions are written by Law Assessment in the style of the current LSAT and explain every option. Official past tests are available from LSAC.
Two Logical Reasoning sections, one Reading Comprehension section with a comparative passage pair, and two Argumentative Writing prompts with a guide to what a strong essay does. Each section is timed at 35 minutes.